-45-
Letters
ON ROMANISM VS. JUDAISM
Dear N. H.
May 18, 1991
Thank you for your letter ... It is
certain that the Pope and the Popish system is wicked, and that
the roads leading to Rome have flowed with the blood of the
martyrs of Jesus. But the Jews in the Babylonian Talmud (Soncino
Edition) say that Jesus Christ is in Hell in boiling excrement (Git.
56b-57a). The Jewish Encyclopedia (1901-1905) affirms as
well that Jesus is in Hell (p. 172).
The Jewish Encyclopedia calls Him a
bastard, and on p. 170, it says his mother Mary "was known to be
an adulteress." The Talmud says, "She who was the
descendants of princes and governors played the harlot with
carpenters" (Sanh. 106b).
The Talmud declares Christ to have
practiced sorcery (Sanh. 43a), while in Shabbethai 104b, and in
Sanhedrin 67a, it calls Him the "son of Pandera" and "Ben Strada."
The Toldoth Jesu is a
Medieval rabbinic tale about Jesus, and declares that Judas
"pissed upon Jesus, and they both became unclean" (chap. 4:43).
In unedited versions, The Talmud
declares Jesus was excommunicated for the thought of seducing a
woman, and that in his ensuing grief, and confusion, He began to
worship a brick (Sanh. 107b). The Jewish Encyclopedia
affirms the same (p. 170). What Pope ever said such things?
OF JEWS AS PAGANS
Dear F. F.
October 30, 1987
...The Jews have not accepted the
righteousness of God in the person of His Son (Proverbs 30:4).
They are as great pagans as Moslems, Buddhists, or Hindus.
"Neither is there salvation in any other, for there is none
other name under heaven, given among men, whereby we must be
saved" (Acts 4:12). It is at the name of Jesus that every knee
shall bow (Philippians 2:10). Not Siva or Vishnu of the Hindus,
not Allah of the Moslems, and not Buddha is able to save men
from sin. Jehovah has provided one gate only into heaven, and
even this is an act of grace.
Christ Jesus, "being in the form of
God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: but made
himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a
servant, and was made in the likeness of men: and being found in
fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto
death, even the death of the cross. Wherefore God also hath
highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every
name: that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things
in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; and
that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to
the glory of God the Father" (Philippians 2:6-11).
TO A HATER OF JEWS
Dear P. C.
February 21, 1988
...I was amazed at your
willingness to judge everyone with whom you disagree with being
a Jew. But as I thought on these things, I did not pity you so
much as I pitied them who have fed you such falsehoods. I
hesitate to respond because I do not think it will do any good;
however, in order to be faithful to truth, I must.
I cannot believe you could be so
easily led to believe that the "translators from Hebrew to Greek
to Latin were primarily Jews." Neither were they Jews who
translated the King James Bible.
John Calvin was a Frenchman whose name was
originally Chauvin or Caulvin, not Cohan. No, sir, he was not a
Jew. I suspect you probably read that in material published by
Sheldon Emry, pastor of the Lord's Covenant Church, although I
will not even accuse him of such nonsense.
Regarding the Jews: First, most Jews do
not know what is taught in the Talmud. ...And, although the Jews
declare that they were never in captivity, this does not alter
the fact. Truth cannot be based upon falsehood; and, the
statement by the Jews found in John 8:33 was never assented to
by the Lord.
Second, as early as 700 B. C., the
Israelites were called Jews (See: II Kings 16:6). Although this
should settle the argument, you do not accept the Bible as
authoritative, so it remains an open-ended issue with you.
It is exceedingly dangerous to give anybody our eyes, our
ears, and our time. We need to be sure who we are studying
after, for as Paul warns, many there be who lie in wait to
deceive.
Third, one fact that you evidently do not
understand is that the reason the Jews called Jesus, "Jesus of
Nazareth" was to obfuscate every sign of His being the Messiah.
When He was arrested in the Garden, Jesus was told the soldiers
had come to arrest "Jesus of Nazareth." He could have said, "I
am not He," because He was not: He was Jesus of Bethlehem.
The fact the Jews called Him, "Jesus of
Nazareth" does not mean it was true: it was in fact a lie, like
the one spoken by the serpent in Eden when he told Eve, "Thou
shalt not surely die." Peter used this surname of the Lord
simply because it was the name by which He was popularly known,
and under which He was crucified (John 19:19).
Judah was taken into captivity 136 years
after Israel. In Babylon, the people became commonly known as
"Jews." Therefore, Paul identifies himself as a "Jew" (Acts
21:39; II Corinthians 11:22; and Philippians 3:5). Note: Paul
says he was a Jew.
Jesus was a Jew as He was from the tribe
of Judah (Matthew 1:2; Hebrews 7:14). Paul declares He was "made
under the Law" (Galatians 4:14). It is evident that this does
not refer to civil, i.e. to Roman Law, because He observed the
Passover. He was under Jewish, i.e. Mosaic Law.
However, if the Scriptures are not
our authority, there is no way to solve anything. This is the
reason Peter declared the most fundamental knowledge of
Spiritual things is predicated upon this single fact: "No
prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation" (II
Peter 1:20,21).
The amanuenses of Holy Writ did not sit down and
write because they had a hankering to write. Instead, they were
"moved by the Holy Ghost," and Peter says it is of utmost
importance that this be first established. "May God Smile On
You."—Bach
Contents
Previous
Next |