Table of Contents

 

-73-

FOR BETTER OR WORSE:

The Income Tax

     President Abraham Lincoln introduced the first graduated income tax in July 1862. In a booklet published by the Office of Internal Revenue dated January 1971, entitled Our Federal Tax System, and numbered 462, it is stated:

Finally in July 1862, President Lincoln signed into law the most sweeping revenue-producing measure in the nation's history to that time. The new law provided for progressive taxation for levies on incomes and for tax withholding.

     The booklet then lays bare the reason why the income tax was introduced: "Above all they insisted on taxation as a means of regulating the economy."

     The Constitution prohibits direct taxation; therefore, when Congress passed a tariff law in the 1890's that provided for a small income tax, the tariff law was challenged in the Federal courts and was twice argued in the Supreme Court. The second time, in 1895, the income tax instituted by President Lincoln was ruled unconstitutional and was outlawed. The Court ruled any income tax constituted direct taxation. As a result, the Income Tax Office of the Internal Revenue was dismantled.

     In 1909, President Taft was inaugurated in a time when the government needed money. By ignoring the Supreme Court ruling, Congress instituted another income tax. National repentance would necessitate dissolving the graduated income tax which finances everything from sodomy organizations to "studies" into the sex lives of porpoises, and funding organizations founded to preserve the whale to those dedicated to the destruction of children by aborticide.

The Responsibility of Magistrates

     Like everyone else, magistrates are responsible to subject themselves to the "higher powers." Since God is the Author of all authority, and the sole Lawgiver (James 4:12) every soul is responsible to acknowledge His authority by rendering cheerful obedience. "Let every soul be subject to the higher powers." This is the will of God. It was the willing subjection to God's authority that made paradise of Eden, and that will make paradise in Heaven.

     Since "there is no power, or authority, but of God," and "the powers that be are ordained of God" every soul is obligated to subject himself to His government so long as he is a part of God's creation. All breathe the air God has provided, all walk upon His earth, and all live because of His gift of life that courses their veins.

The Authority of Magistrates

   Since God is the Author of authority, all who resist God-appointed authority contend with the Almighty, "and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation." "They that do such things (i.e. cause sedition) shall not inherit the kingdom of God.” (Galatians 5:19-21)

     It was the good pleasure of God to identify the kind of authority He has appointed: "Rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil." Tyrants therefore have no legitimate authority. Their rule is a mockery of the kindly rule of God. Calvin states " ...Dictatorships and unjust authorities are not ordained governments" (Calvin, The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Romans and to the Thessalonians, 281). He then proceeds to explain,

They are not to rule on their own account, but for the public good. Nor do they have unbridled power, but power that is restricted to the welfare of their subjects. In short, they are responsible to God and to men in the exercise of their rule (Calvin, 282).

     God may chastise nations by raising up tyrants to rule over them as in the times of Israel's judges, but when His people humble themselves, and pray, and seek His face, and turn from their wicked ways, He will hear from Heaven. He will forgive their sins, and He will heal their land.

God-ordained rulers are a terror to evildoers, and are a glory to the good. For this reason Godly people revere their authority, and yield lawful obedience. But is it lawful to yield obedience to lawless rulers, and to obey those laws that disregard the mandates of Heaven? Since there is but one Lawgiver, it is not possible for lawful legislation to contradict the Law of God. Is it in accordance with the Law of God and consistent with His will for us to obey the Laws of men when they are contrary to the Law of God? Peter addressed this issue twice in the book of Acts. In Acts 4:19, Peter and John were curt in their response to the rulers of the Jews: “Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye." And again in chapter 5 the apostles are arrested, and in verse 29 they answer the rulers of the Jews, “We ought to obey God rather than men."

 

Back  Next