|
-42-
Letters
TO ONE WHO BELIEVES IN ANNIHILATIONISM
Dear R. W.
May 11, 1988
...First, the Scriptures contend
they are "not of any private interpretation," i.e., they are to
be interpreted as the Holy Spirit has given believers to
understand them through the ages. Since "in the multitude of
counsellors there is wisdom" does your exegesis of Scripture
bear up according to the way godly men have interpreted it
throughout the centuries? Is your handling of eschatology the
same as John Gill, for instance, or Adam Clarke, or Matthew
Henry, John Calvin, Martin Luther, John Trapp, John Brown,
Thomas Watson, etc.?
Second, your equating the word "torment"
with "torture" is absurd. The former can be the product of the
latter, but is not necessarily so. Your caricaturizing those who
believe in the everlasting torment of the damned with believing
God tortures the damned is like John R. Rice depicting
Calvinists as believing that God forces the non-elect against
their will into eternal perdition, or like Jefferson equating
trinitarians with believing in tri-theism.
I suspect that you are an Adventist at
heart. I must go. You are in our heart.
Dear R. W.
August 22, 1988
...In Matthew 22:32, we read,
"I am ..." (the present tense, meaning "right now, this moment
and forever"); "I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac,
and the God of Jacob" (yet they were buried in the cave at
Machpelah before Mamre). Jesus testifies, nevertheless, "God is
not the God of the dead, but of the living." Abraham, Isaac and
Jacob, etc. are living now. Their bodies will rise, however,
when their breath and soul reunite with the body.
In Matthew 25:46, we read, "And these
shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous
into life eternal." Calvin says of "everlasting life" that it
"ever-lasts, or it is not everlasting." The same is true here.
Some years ago, an outlawed army captured
a missionary. For several days the missionary preached the
gospel of Jesus Christ to the soldiers. At last, the order was
received that the missionary must be put to death so that he
could not disclose their location. As an act of mercy, the
soldiers drugged the missionary so that his death would be an
easy one. You see, where there is no consciousness, there can be
no torment, and hence there can be no punishment.
ON THE EXISTENCE OF THE JEWS
Dear D. W.
December 16, 1987
...Instead of trying to think
up some new thing, you ought to receive the Scriptures as "Thus
saith the Lord." Your unwillingness to do so has placed you in
rational and spiritual straits. "Remove not the ancient
landmark" (Proverbs 22:28) for "If the foundations be destroyed,
what can the righteous do" (Psalm 11:3)
Jesus is clearly identified as a Jew in
John 4:9: "How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me,
which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with
the Samaritans." And, in Hebrews 7:14, we read, "It is evident
that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which tribe Moses spake
nothing concerning priesthood." To argue that all Jews are
"antichrist" is as fallacious as saying that all Baptists are
Christians. The Bible calls Barnabas a Jew for he was a Levite
(Acts 4:36). And, in Acts 10:28, we read, "Ye know how that it
is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company or
to come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that
I should not call any man common or unclean." Peter is the Jew
here speaking.
Apollos was a Jew according to Acts
18:24, and in Acts 21:39, Paul declares, "I am a man which am a
Jew of Tarsus ..." (See: II Corinthians 11:22 and Philippians
3:5). And, in Acts 16:20, Silas is also identified as being a
Jew.
The argument that the Jews no longer
exist won't wash. "Hath God cast away his people? God forbid.
For I also am an Israelite of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe
of Benjamin" (Romans 11:1). While you attempt to make a
distinction between being a "Jew" and being an "Israelite," and
declare believers today to be Israelites, remember we are the
wild olive tree that was grafted in—we are by faith children of
Abraham, but not in a national sense. That there is a difference
is clear from the fact that Paul enunciates what tribe he is
from.
The prophetess Anna (Luke 2:36) tells us
she is from the tribe of Asshur. Zachariah (Luke 1:5) was of the
tribe of Levi. Paul declares he was of the tribe of Benjamin
(Philippians 3:5). And, we have already seen that Scripture
declares Jesus to have been of the tribe of Judah. The point is,
you cannot have 10 tribes supposedly lost since the Babylonian
Captivity when we have here 5 of the tribes here identified. To
recapitulate: we are by faith the children of Israel, with
Abraham as our father—but not in the physical sense. Must go.
Contents
Previous
Next |