-36-
Letters
AN ANSWER TO CORNELIUS STAM
Dear T. L.
December 12, 1991
...The
article you sent written by Cornelius Stam is basically a good
article. If my memory is correct, the writer is a Plymouth
Brethren, or a follower of John Nelson Darby of England. They
are very dispensational, and for this reason he would make the
statement, "...God in grace interrupted the prophetic program
and, holding the promise of the kingdom in abeyance, ushered in
the present dispensation of grace." I am not a rabid
dispensationalist; that is, men who were saved in any age were
saved by grace. This is one of the errors of following Scofield
too closely.
First, Stam makes a great
generalization when he says 5-point Calvinists do not believe in
praying for the lost. I am a 5-pointer, and I pray for the lost
and go door-to-door passing out gospel tracts and preaching the
gospel.
Second, The Synod of Dort was
called to answer the "5 Points" taught by the followers of
Arminius. They called their counter "Calvinism" in honor of John
Calvin whom they considered to be the greatest expositor of
Scripture since the days of the Apostle Paul. Whether we call it
"Calvinism" or "Biblicism" it is the Bible position.
Third, I do not doubt Stam's
sincerity, but his theology is woefully flawed because he fails
to see that every epistle in the New Testament is written to
believers, and not to the lost. The result of this is that he
takes passages that apply to believers and applies them to all
men. This is serious because it leads to the misapplication of
Scripture. For instance, in II Peter 3:9, Peter says, "The Lord
is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count
slackness; but is longsuffering TO USWARD, not willing that any
should perish, but that all should come to repentance." This
does not say that God is not willing that any should perish, but
that He is not willing that any of us His chosen ones should
perish.
When Stam says God loves all men, it is a
direct contradiction of what the Bible teaches (See: Psalm 5:5;
11:5). If God did not want any to perish, the Almighty could
prevent it. Must close.
OF LOVING EVERYONE
Dear G. M.
December 16, 1986
...You state that God commands
you to love everyone. Where does God command you do this? God
says David was a man after His own heart (Acts 13:22), yet,
David says, "Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am
not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them
with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies" (Psalm
139:21,22).
You evidently did not take to heart
the words of Jehu, God's prophet who rebuked Jehoshaphat, king
of Judah for loving king Ahab. "Shouldest thou help the ungodly,
and love them that hate the LORD? therefore is wrath upon thee
from before the LORD" (II Chronicles 19:2). ...
TO AN UNSTABLE INDIVIDUAL
Dear D. W.
May 2, 1992
You use your reasoning as a smoke
screen to excuse yourself from the obedience every creature owes
his Creator. The Holy Spirit speaking through the Apostle Paul
declares, "Not many wise men after the flesh ...are called" (I
Corinthians 1:26). For this reason you better beware lest your
machinations lead you to damnation.
D., there is such a thing as
"truth". Any man who is constantly running after new ideas is an
unstable individual, and one who does not know what to believe.
One has to have a point from which to reason that is greater
than man, or else his opinion is as good as the next man's
opinion, and both fall into the ditch.
God reveals to some, and hides from
others. When God teaches a man by His Spirit through His Word,
it would be extreme ingratitude if he thinks so little of the
truth he has learned that he barters it away for the
machinations of every would-be teacher that comes along.
The one thing necessary in order to
"learn" is humility. James wrote, "Be not many masters
(teachers) knowing that we shall receive the greater
condemnation" (3:1). It is one thing for a man to reject truth,
but it is much more damnable when he encourages others to reject
truth with him.
D., have you ever
seen yourself in the light of God's holiness? Have you ever
acknowledged that if God were to leave a man to himself to
perish in his sins, God is still good? Have you ever been taught
that unless Christ does all for our salvation, we are lost, and
will "go away into everlasting punishment" (Matthew 25:46)? Have
you ever humbled yourself before the Lord having been smitten by
a contrite heart? D., I want you to go with me to heaven; and it
is not through any goodness of our own that will allow us to
enter there. We can only be saved by the grace of God.
Dear D. I.
August 24, 1991
Gospel work is to
be done decently and in order. God's kingdom is not built by
anarchy where every man does that which is right in his own
eyes. "Be not many masters," James warns, because "we shall
receive the greater condemnation." Therefore, a man needs to
know beyond any shadow of a doubt that God has called him. Then,
he ...needs to know what he believes, and why he believes it. In
your case, I could not at this time in good conscience
(recommend you). It is not that you are not a good man; it is
that you are one of the most unstable people I have met: you do
not know what you believe.
Doctrine is not a trifle, but
is something men have had to die for. Are you a Methodist? a
Baptist? a Presbyterian? a Plymouth Brethren?
Can you accept paedo-baptism? or do
you believe in believer's baptism? You cannot hold to both. Can
you emulate the doctrinal heresies of Finney? or are you a
convinced Calvinist? Do you believe a man can lose his
salvation? or do you believe if God begins a good work in us
that He will perform that work until the day of Jesus Christ?
You see, I do not know what you know
of the gospel. You are a church hopper. Could I sanction your
preaching or pastoring people when you do not sit still long
enough to let anyone look at you?
I love you in the bonds of Christ,
but this does not mean I can sanction doctrinal aberrations or
whims. But I would like to think that one day I might have the
privilege of seeing you working diligently, doing a work for
God. Must go.
Contents
Previous
Next |