-25-
Letters
TO ONE WHO BELIEVES JESUS CHRIST WAS
NOT A JEW
Dear W. K. M.
January 4, 1988
Having talked with you at
length on the telephone on 3 past occasions, at which times I
felt that my spirit bore witness with yours, I believe in
writing to you, I am writing to my brother. At this point, I do
not believe you worship another Christ, but rather that you do
not believe rightly about Christ.
You have imbibed false teaching. Who
knows but that God who caused our paths to cross may have
purposed our meeting to correct such heterodoxy in your
thinking. We both cannot be right. It is all too evident from
your communications that you did not learn your views on Adam
and on the Jews from the Bible, but from Pastor Sheldon Emry,
and that you have since gone to Scripture to validate his
doctrinal tenets. This is to use the Bible as a secondary,
instead of the primary source of faith.
You are in great error; but I
am a friend, and not your enemy for telling you that. Only our
best friends are gut-honest with us. "Faithful are the wounds of
a friend."
Like it nor not, Jesus Christ is a
Jew. He was, according to the flesh, from the tribe of Judah
(Matthew 1:2; Hebrews 7:14). Paul declares that "he was made
under the Law" (Galatians 4:4). That this does not simply refer
to civil, or to Roman Law, is seen from the fact that He
observed the Passover Feast. He was under Jewish, or Mosaic Law.
This is the whole import of the book of Hebrews.
The only way you can cite
Webster's American Dictionary of The English Language (1828)
that states a "Jew" is a "Hebrew" or "Israelite"; then cite
Strong's Concordance that a Jew is a "descendant of Judah"; and
then concede Matthew's Gospel records Jesus was from the tribe
of Judah—and then to come to the conclusion that Jesus was not a
Jew is by intellectual dishonesty.
You agree Christ Jesus was born in
Judea, but hasten to add that He departed into Egypt. So what?
My wife was born in Ohio. Although she has lived in Georgia for
20 years (half her life), she is still "from" Ohio. The fact
that Joseph and Mary took Jesus as a child from their refuge in
Egypt into Galilee, to the city of Nazareth cannot be honorably
used as an argument that He was not a "Jew."
One great fact that you evidently do
not understand is that the reason the Jews called Him "Jesus of
Nazareth" was to obfuscate every sign of His being the Messiah.
When He was arrested in the Garden, He asked, "Whom seek ye?"
They answered, "Jesus of Nazareth" (John 18:4,5). He could have
said, "I am not He" because He was not: He was Jesus of
Bethlehem.
The fact the Jews called Him "Jesus of
Nazareth" does not make it true: it was in fact a lie, like the
one spoken by the serpent in Eden when he told Eve, "Thou shalt
not surely die." Peter used this surname of the Lord simply
because it was the name by which Jesus was commonly known, and
under which name He was crucified (John 19:19).
Judah was taken into captivity 136
years after Israel. In Babylon, the people became commonly known
as "Jews." Therefore, Paul identifies himself as a "Jew" (Acts
21:39; II Corinthians 11:22; and Philippians 3:5). Paul says he
was a Jew. Pastor Sheldon Emry comes along and contradicts
Paul's word. Does he know better than the Apostle? Is he wiser
than God's Word on the subject? Will you follow Pastor Emry
instead of the Bible?
You must believe God's Word, or you
will have to re-translate the Scriptures. I should not need to
warn you of the fierce anathemas that are pronounced upon
everyone who tampers with the Word of God. ...
Dear D. W.
January 27, 1988
...Regarding the issue whether
Jesus was or is a Jew: your arguments are fallacious because you
do not recognize that Jewry has to do with nationality as well
as with religion. Incidentally, there is not, and has never been
a "race" called "Jew." You err by equating nationality with
race. The Bible says nothing about "race" except the kind run
with the feet. The idea of race is purely of evolutionary
derivation.
Jesus is a Jew in the sense
that He is from the tribe of Judah. ...In fact, Jesus was "made
under the law" as I so stated before. He observed the Passover
Feast, etc. which shows that He was under Jewish, i.e. Mosaic
Law. Your position is totally indefensible and illogical.
You used the illustration that
a man who left Italy 20 years ago and became a citizen was no
longer an Italian. That is not true. He may be considered an
American citizen, but he is still an Italian by extraction. He
did not lose his Italian facial features, or ancestry; and if
Italy was destroyed by an earthquake, or, as you say, "slid into
the sea," yes, he would still be an American citizen of Italian
descent.
He was Jew nationally,
according to the flesh, and He was a Jew religiously, even
though the Jewish people rejected Him as the Messiah, or Christ,
promised. He remains a Jew forever, according to the flesh,
since He rose physically from the dead.
Contents
Previous
Next |