Table of Contents

 

-58-

FOR BETTER OR WORSE:

     In 1913, our national debt was one billion "dollars." By 1983 it reached one trillion, one hundred billion dollars (Griffin, 191), and by 1986 it has been estimated to be 4 trillion "dollars." On page 189, Mr. Griffin states the Federal government "pays" to the bankers annual "interest" of I00 billion "dollars" from income taxes. Thomas Jefferson wisely said, "I wish it were possible to obtain an additional article to our Constitution ... I mean an article taking from the Federal government the power of borrowing" (Two Faces of Debt”, 19).

     Mr. Jefferson wrote,

 I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers to be feared. We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our choice between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude . . . The same prudence which in private life would forbid our paying money for unexplained projects, forbids it in the disposition of public money. We are endeavoring to reduce the government to the practice of rigid economy to avoid burdening the people . . ." (Saussy, 34).

     Taxation was the tool the Federal government employed to destroy state (wildcat) banks. It has been often stated, "The power to tax is the power to destroy." What then will happen to religious freedom in this land if the Federal government begins to tax churches?

      President Wilson sought the counsel of attorney Louis D. Brandeis. At his advice, the President declared on June 17th that he would insist upon government control of the Federal Reserve Board and would insist upon making Federal Reserve notes the obligation of the United States (Johnson, 24).

     On June 23, 1913, President Wilson addressed a joint session of Congress and presented his proposals. Many saw it an "assault on private rights" (Johnson, 26); and as a bill sponsored by the Democratic Party and its "anti-business" elements (Johnson, 26). It is a true saying that tyranny emerges out of chaos. If God's Law of a just weight and measure had been "fixed" and unalterable, and so "regulated", such a proposal would never have been proposed to the American people, and chaos would not have appeared in the economy of our land.

     On June 25th, President Wilson met with the Currency Commission of the American Banking Association where it was determined to gradually retire National Bank notes (Johnson, 27). But all was not well for the Administration: a faction within the Democratic Party revolted, and demanded the President destroy the "Money Trust." Chiefly from the Southern and Western states, they believed the Trust was a private institution operating by government protection.

The Democratic Revolt

     The revolt was led by Robert Henry, a Texas Congressman. In a prepared statement he declared,

The bill as now written is wholly in the interest of the creditor classes, the banking fraternity and the commercial world, without proper provision for the debtor classes and those who toil, produce, and sustain the country (Johnson, 28).

      In July they gained control of the House Banking and Currency Committee (Johnson, 28), but William Jennings Bryan, now Secretary of State Bryan, moved to oppose them! He called upon the Democratic Party to support the President, and not to embarrass him. According to Mr. Hicks, "It was Bryan more than . . . anyone else that had made Wilson President, and Bryan, if left outside the Wilson entourage, had the power to cause the new Administration endless trouble" (Hicks, 442).

     Amid opposition that called the bill "a Communistic idea" (Johnson, 29), Mr. Carter Glass began in early September to push the bill through the House. On September 18th, the bill cleared the House by a vote of 287 to 85 (Johnson, 31). All but 3 Democrats supported the bill, while 70 percent of the Republicans opposed it (Johnson, 31).

     The annual meeting of the American Bankers Association met in Boston in early October and passed a series of resolutions denouncing the Federal Reserve bill as "socialistic, confiscatory, unjust, un-American, and generally wretched” (Johnson, 32).

 

 

Back  Next